Vizuna vs 360 Reviews
Vizuna vs 360 Reviews
360s are a once-a-year performance event. Vizuna is an ongoing trust signal — source-protected, lightweight, and focused on behaviour change.
How is Vizuna different from 360 Reviews? Vizuna measures professional trust through source-protected colleague reflections using the Trust Equation (Credibility, Reliability, Safety, Selflessness), while 360 Reviews focuses on 360-degree feedback. Vizuna provides continuous, private measurement rather than periodic reviews.
- Recurring micro-feedback versus annual multi-rater assessment
- Source-protected reporting that reduces attribution risk
- Behaviour-focused Actions instead of competency ratings
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | 360 Reviews | Vizuna |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Annual | Recurring |
| Time | 45–60 minutes | 2–3 min reflection flow |
| Privacy model | Attributed (raters known to admins) | Source-protected, aggregate reporting |
| Output | Competency rating report | Prioritized actions + guidance |
| Focus | Past performance | Forward-looking behaviour change |
Trust-by-design, not by policy
Vizuna is designed to keep organisation-facing reporting aggregate and source-protected, without turning trust into surveillance.
No names. No ranking.
Organisation-facing reporting is designed to reduce attribution risk and avoid linking trends back to one person.
Aggregated, not attributed.
Signals appear only after combining multiple colleague perspectives.
Patterns, not people.
The system is built to prevent monitoring or employee ranking.
Common concerns — and the reality
"This could expose leadership weaknesses."
Unmeasured trust doesn’t protect leaders. It only delays the moment they lose credibility.
"People will game the system."
Gaming is itself a signal of low trust. Well-designed systems surface this behaviour rather than conceal it.
"This won’t work in our culture."
Culture doesn’t reject trust. It rejects inconsistency and hypocrisy.
Ready to measure trust more directly than 360-degree feedback?