Vizuna vs 360 Reviews
Vizuna vs 360 Reviews
360s are a once-a-year performance event. Vizuna is an ongoing trust signal — source-protected, lightweight, and focused on behaviour change.
How is Vizuna different from 360 Reviews? Vizuna measures professional trust through source-protected colleague reflections using the Trust Equation (Credibility, Reliability, Safety, Selflessness), while 360 Reviews focuses on 360-degree feedback. Vizuna provides continuous, private measurement rather than periodic reviews.
- Recurring micro-feedback versus annual multi-rater assessment
- Source-protected reporting that reduces attribution risk
- Behaviour-focused Actions instead of competency ratings
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | 360 Reviews | Vizuna |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Annual | Recurring |
| Time | 45–60 minutes | 5 minutes |
| Privacy model | Attributed (raters known to admins) | Source-protected, aggregate reporting |
| Output | Competency rating report | Prioritized actions + guidance |
| Focus | Past performance | Forward-looking behaviour change |
Privacy & governance
No names. No ranking. No attribution.
Vizuna is designed to keep organisation-facing reporting aggregate and source-protected, without turning trust into surveillance.
No names. No ranking.
Organisation-facing reporting is designed to reduce attribution risk and avoid linking trends back to one person.
Aggregated, not attributed.
Signals appear only after combining multiple colleague perspectives.
Patterns, not people.
The system is built to prevent monitoring or employee ranking.
Built-in privacy constraint
Built for aggregate, source-protected reporting.
Vizuna is designed so org-facing analytics focus on patterns across multiple reflections rather than exposing who said what.
Signal submitted
Colleague reflection recorded
Aggregated
Combined with multiple others
Pattern only
Individual signals stripped away
Aggregate output
Only aggregate patterns reach the surface
Ready to measure trust more directly than 360-degree feedback?