Vizuna vs Engagement Surveys
Vizuna vs Engagement Surveys
Annual surveys measure sentiment. Vizuna measures the trust dynamics behind it — recurring, source-protected, and paired with clear next-step guidance.
How is Vizuna different from Engagement Surveys? Vizuna measures professional trust through source-protected colleague reflections using the Trust Equation (Credibility, Reliability, Safety, Selflessness), while Engagement Surveys focuses on engagement survey. Vizuna provides continuous, private measurement rather than periodic reviews.
- Recurring signal instead of quarterly or annual snapshots
- Clear next-step guidance — not a 40-page slide deck
- Aggregate, privacy-gated reporting
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Engagement Surveys | Vizuna |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Quarterly or annual | Recurring |
| Time | 20–30 minutes | 5 minutes |
| Output | Slide deck weeks later | Prioritized actions + trend |
| Privacy model | Often limited or optional | Aggregate, privacy-gated |
| What it measures | Satisfaction / sentiment | Trust dynamics (CRSS) |
Privacy & governance
No names. No ranking. No attribution.
Vizuna is designed to keep organisation-facing reporting aggregate and source-protected, without turning trust into surveillance.
No names. No ranking.
Organisation-facing reporting is designed to reduce attribution risk and avoid linking trends back to one person.
Aggregated, not attributed.
Signals appear only after combining multiple colleague perspectives.
Patterns, not people.
The system is built to prevent monitoring or employee ranking.
Built-in privacy constraint
Built for aggregate, source-protected reporting.
Vizuna is designed so org-facing analytics focus on patterns across multiple reflections rather than exposing who said what.
Signal submitted
Colleague reflection recorded
Aggregated
Combined with multiple others
Pattern only
Individual signals stripped away
Aggregate output
Only aggregate patterns reach the surface
Ready to measure trust more directly than engagement survey?